Friday, November 22, 2013
My Reddit AMA starts in 30 minutes.
I'll be on Reddit for a couple of hours answering questions about my knowledge of Jim Garrison and the Clay Shaw Trials, which I sat in on in 1969.
Friday, November 1, 2013
Jim Garrison and me
Jim Garrison was an
enigma. He had a brilliant mind, but his mind was not analytical. He had a
great sense of humor, but often others humor was lost on him. He was reasonably
well read, but yet was confounded by well-known quotes from well-known sources.
He was politically savvy; yet one of the most naïve elected officials when
political savvy was most needed by him.
I first met Jim in
late 1964 or early 1965 and instantly liked him. One of my good friends, Max
Mercer was an assistant district attorney in his office and he introduced me to
the “Giant;” a nickname given to him because of his massive size.
When the Clay Shaw trial arose in 1967, and Jim attempted to implicate him in the Kennedy assassination, I was practicing law in New Orleans. For about seven or eight years, I had coffee every morning with Irvin Dymond, who was the primary lawyer for Clay Shaw, the man charged by Garrison with conspiring to kill President Kennedy. Irvin had a beautiful mellifluous voice which offset the basso profondo of Jim Garrison. The anticipation of a brawl between those two legal titans was greatly anticipated by the locals and by the national media alike. What a disappointment when Garrison made an opening statement and then turned the trial over to his assistants, Jim Alcock and Al Oser. He was not seen again until he made one of the prosecution’s feeble closing arguments.
Al Oser was a fraternity brother of mine, and I met Alcock through Max Mercer; both were adequate lawyers but lacked the gravitas of the Giant. The trial lasted about three weeks and over fifty witnesses testified. Thanks to Irvin Dymond, I was able to sit through five or six days of this embarrassing display of justice, and like most people at the time, judged Jim’s case a farce. After three weeks of testimony from over fifty witnesses, it took the jury less than an hour to arrive at their not guilty verdict. It was hardly sufficient time for the jury to choose a foreman and take an up-or-down vote. Obviously, they were not impressed with the prosecution’s evidence.
I knew several witnesses, such as, Andrew Moo-Moo Sciambra, an assistant district attorney and Dean Andrews, a local hack lawyer, among them. It made no difference who testified, the case was flawed from the first. This judicial disgrace was beneath the lowest standard of any district attorney’s office.
Later, in 1971, Max
and I attempted to goad Jim into running for the Senate of the United States
and wrote a paper outlining the reasons he should run. The incumbent, Allen J.
Ellender, was a long time member of that body and was firmly entrenched in the
good-ole-boy network in Washington. North Louisiana’s Baptist majority was
enamored with Garrison because he had attacked the drug and prostitution rings
on Bourbon Street and in addition, his stature among the greater New Orleans
population was never stronger. Only the Cajun areas were strongly for the reelection
of the incumbent.
Ultimately, Jim shied away from the race, even though we thought he could easily have defeated Ellender. Suddenly, a North Louisiana politician, Bennett Johnson entered the race. Ellender dropped dead during the primary and the rest is history. Johnson served in the U.S. Senate from November of 1972 until January of 1997. Had Jim been more aware he would have been one of a hundred members of an august body and not one of the many thousands of D.A.’s throughout the country. Jim once told me, long after the jury had acquitted Shaw, that he had chosen the wrong venue for the trial. “The stage in New Orleans was too small. I needed the national stage in Washington if I could pull it off,” he said. I never knew if Jim believed Shaw was guilty or not, but I assumed he ultimately convinced himself of the man’s guilt. I saw Jim almost daily at the New Orleans Athletic Club, but never spoke to him again about the trial.
Later, after I supported Harry Connick’s successful run for DA against Jim, and before Jim ran for the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals in Louisiana, he was practicing law a few blocks from my office and asked if I would help him prepare a brief he was writing. It seems, Jim was a patient in a local hospital; fell out of bed, reinjured his bad back, and brought a malpractice case against the hospital. He represented himself at the trial and the jury awarded him a large sum of money. I worked with him on his brief to the Court of Appeals, but it was hopeless; the law was against us.
I often wonder whether Jim would have brought his Kennedy conspiracy theory before the United States Senate had he been elected to that body. But I do know one thing; if he was standing at the lectern on the floor of the senate, it would have been damned interesting to find out.
Monday, October 28, 2013
Why did I do it?
One of the reasons I wrote Green in Judgment, Cold in Blood was because I had always been
fascinated with the multiple conspiracy theories that constantly swirled around
the corpus of JFK. Multiple shooters, CIA, FBI, Military Brass, Secret Service,
Mafia, Lyndon Johnson, Castro, Jack Ruby, and Lee Harvey Oswald all contributed
to the mystique surrounding the death of the president. A writer can make a
certifiably accurate description of the assassination by extrapolating one or
more of the above suspects, plug them into a November 22nd scenario,
and voila, you have a non-fiction
account of the most talked about and written about event since the crucifixion
of Christ.
I have a personal reason for wanting to know what
happened that fateful day in Dallas. I voted for John Fitzgerald Kennedy on
November 8, 1960, and I don’t want my vote to be wasted. So I set about
constructing my own skewed view of the facts and fictionalized a result based
on an exhaustive research of the Kennedy years in office. I purposefully
highlighted the frailties of JFK in order to best lend a modicum of credence to
my protagonists desire to murder him.
The dialogue between the many non-fiction characters
were, for the most part, a figment of my imagination. It isn’t often one gets
to put words in great men’s mouths and I enjoyed the hell out of doing it. In
the last fifty years, everyone has died who could reconstruct the events of
that bleak November day in Dealey Plaza, so we will never know the true story.
As memories fade about a young president and only Hollywood’s
mischaracterizations remain, we will never know the accuracy of JFK’s
contemporary’s opinions; nor will we ever know the true nature of our heroes
and villains in that storybook ending. I like to think my fictional version is
as accurate as the pundits like to think theirs are.
Friday, October 18, 2013
Green in Judgement Cold in Blood Available now
Peter Abadie is launching his e-book today. Green in Judgment, Cold in Blood, may be
purchased through Nook, Apple book store, Kobe, Smashwords, Sony, and Diesel. Kindle
should be available either tomorrow or Sunday. If you prefer to wait, we will
have a printed copy available at Amazon and hopefully, at a bookstore near you.
We are presently in negotiations with a local New Orleans uptown bookstore to
have a book signing in November and will notify you when the plans are
finalized.
Today is my birthday. It is also the birthday of Lee
Harvey Oswald, who would have been seventy-four, had he lived. I chose this release
date because the book GJCB is an historical novel based on John F. Kennedy’s
years in office, and to date, Oswald remains inextricably tied to the president.
I wove two fictional characters into a fabric of historic events, while the
fifty non-fictional characters compliment the backdrop. The book took two years
to research and another year to write and should satisfy those assassination
doubters and Warren Commission believers alike.
I hope you like the read and will please notify your
friends on Facebook and other social media sites about the book. Also, if you
could leave a comment about the book at the place you bought it, it would be
greatly appreciated. Thank you and hope to see you soon. Peter Abadie
http://www.amazon.com/Green-Judgement-Blood-Peter-Abadie-ebook/dp/B00G0037LS/ref=sr_1_fkmr2_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1382911983&sr=8-1-fkmr2&keywords=peter+j+abadie
You can purchase the book at this link.
You can purchase the book at this link.
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
A little information about Peter
Peter Abadie is a fictional writer who specializes in
historically based novels. He takes a bland, newspaper account of an historical
situation, uses the same timeframe and characters as the event produced, weaves
in a few fictional characters, and emerges with an exciting, informing, and
sometimes threatening story.
In order to
enhance his well-researched adventures, he often incorporates his background as
a trial lawyer, an environmental company owner, along with his other many
business experiences, combining them with his travels in Europe, Africa, and
Asia. He has used this methodology throughout ten of his fictional works,
providing a reader with an alternative to history’s conventionally accepted
dogma.
From a rework of the John F. and Robert Kennedy
assassinations (Green in Judgment, Cold in Blood and A Serpent’s Egg); to an
early life of Henry Morton Stanley – the most famous African explorer – (The
Adventures of John Rowlands); to a robbery of the Musée d’Art Moderne de la
Ville de Paris (The Murder of Jane Style); to the motley lives of two thieves
crucified at the side of Jesus (Maledicto), Abadie’s mastery of his subjects is
riveting. Throw in a few crime books and several thrillers and you have the
lot.
Abadie used the French Quarter in New Orleans as his setting
in The Great Reprimand; Chinatown in Boston is the crime scene of another
thriller in Serial is not a Breakfast Food; a convoluted romance emerges in the
castles of Wales, where the travails of the coal mining industry, meshed with a
backdrop of World War I, provide additional color in Pygmalion’s Last Stand.
Two psychiatrists, one a serial killer, match wits to see who will be the last
one standing in Time’s Up. Finally, in his novel Privately Held, a thriller set
in Boston, Abadie unearths the soft underbelly of the corporate world, and the
even softer underbelly of Brahmin high society.
Protagonists
become so intertwined with history in one of Abadie’s stories, it becomes
difficult to distinguish fact from fiction. His expert background in geology, physics, and law emerge as
backdrops in many of his dramas. In 2004, the government of The Federal
Republic of Nigeria and The Democratic Republic of São Tomé e Principe accepted
his work, The Environmental Guidelines applicable within the Nigeria-São Tomé e
Principe Joint Development Zone, as the controlling law in their offshore
waters.
Abadie brings
an abundance of self-deprecating humor to his one non-fiction work, The Stigma
of Jeanne, as he traces his roots from Syria, to Spain, to France, and finally
to the United States where he was born and embarks on the most inexplicable and
hysterically funny adventures. A reader might feel they were being led down a
fallacious path; but they were not. It’s all true.
Friday, August 23, 2013
The Misty Lady
The Stigma of Jeanne
On
February 11, 1858, three young girls approached the River Gave outside the
small town of Lourdes located at the foothills of the Pyrénées Mountains in
Southern France. They were sent on a mission by their parents to gather wood
for the homes of two of the little girls. Marie-Bernard Soubirous, her younger
sister, Toinette, and her friend, Jeanne Abadie were products of the families of
impoverished Basque-French workers. Marie-Bernard was still in shock over her
father losing his main asset, the town’s mill; a loss caused by a downturn in
the local economy. Her malaise was further exacerbated when her father was accused
of defrauding his customers at the mill by shorting their processed grain.
When
the three girls neared the river, Jeanne and Toinette crossed over to the
opposite side and left Marie-Bernard to forage for wood on her own. Marie was physically
weaker than the other two, and played on that fact to remain by herself; but
she was wily, and always was able to manipulate Jeanne and her sister to do her
bidding. The two less mentally endowed children began picking up wood, while
Marie-Bernard sat watching the River Gave go by and contemplated her bleak future.
Marie-Bernard knew she must do something to cut herself away from the herd and
return to the placid life she had experienced prior to the economy decimating
her father’s assets.
When
Jeanne and Toinette came back to Marie-Bernard’s side of the river, they found
her sitting on a rock near the mouth of a cave, and noticed she had not picked
up any wood.
“You
haven’t done anything, Marie. Why?” Jeanne asked.
Marie,
who was prone to daydreaming, began stammering about, looking for an
appropriate excuse for her nonperformance. “I couldn’t gather any wood because
when I came to this cave to look for some, I saw this beautiful lady,” she said
sheepishly. “She just appeared out of the mist and told me the Lord had great
plans for me.” Marie figured if she invoked the Lord’s name, it might divert
the other two girls’ attention away from her laziness.
“What
are you talking about, Marie. There’s no misty lady in that cave,” said Jeanne,
as she peered deeply into the shadows of the grotto. “You just fell asleep,
didn’t you?”
“I
know what I saw and she told me to keep coming back to this cave and she would
appear and talk to me every day,” said Marie, with more gusto this time.
When
the three girls got to Marie’s house, she told her mother the story of the
misty lady as an explanation for why she didn’t have any wood as the other two
did. Her mother was justifiably unmoved, and figured Marie had told the story
because she wanted to get out of performing the chore. She forbad her from
returning to the cave the next day and began to admonish her. But Jeanne Abadie
was a smooth talking little devil and convinced Marie’s mother she might have
seen the mystery lady too, and should allow Marie to return to the cave with her,
just to check out the story. Marie’s mother, having been congenitally inbred, and
therefore terribly naive, bought Jeanne’s package without objection and allowed
the girls to return to the riverside grotto several days later.
By
this time Marie had convinced herself and several other girls in the town she
actually had seen a holy lady. Her insistent behavior allowed the story to take
on a life of its own, gaining momentum with each day of her telling it.
Marie
and Jeanne returned to the cave for the promised reappearance of the illusion.
Marie carried a vile of holy water, recently blessed by the parish priest, to
toss over the apparition’s head in case it was the devil disguised as the
Virgin Mary. She was trailed by a skeptical Jeanne, who still believed Marie
merely wanted to get out of work and hadn’t seen a damned thing in that cave.
When
the two girls neared the cave’s mouth, Marie sprinted forward and shouted, “There
she is! There she is!” She spilled the entire vile of holy water onto the ground.
Jeanne Abadie, in a fit of frustration, because she couldn’t see anything in
the cave, picked up a stone and threw it as hard as she could in the general
direction Marie had indicated the apparition had appeared to her for a second
time. The
stone rattled harmlessly inside the grotto.
Marie
kept asking Jeanne, “You saw her didn’t you, Jeanne? You saw her?”
“Marie,
you just want to get out of working,” a perceptive Jeanne replied. “I told you,
if you did see anything it was the devil, and that’s why I threw a stone at
it.”
When
the two girls returned to the town of Lourdes, Marie insisted she saw an
angelic figure; that Jeanne Abadie hurled a stone at this beautiful lady,
chasing her away; and this lady implored her to return to the grotto so she could
tell her something important.
Marie-Bernard
Soubirous returned again and again to the cave, each time without Jeanne, sixteen
times in all, and on each occasion claimed she had spoken with the mystery lady.
The story quickly morphed into a local legend where Marie could heal people because
she had met with God’s representative, who bestowed curative powers on her. If one
went on a pilgrimage to the grotto, bathed in the River Gave, or drank from
some local spring, miraculous things would happen to one with a deformed body.
The
Catholic Church, in their infinite wisdom, methodically changed her name and canonized
Marie-Bernard Soubirous as Saint Bernadette of Lourdes, and thousands of
inflicted humans flock to the cave and river each year to seek her cure.
When
the town elders of Lourdes realized what a wonderful and profitable thing it
was to have pilgrims genuflecting at Bernadette’s cave and river, they felt it
did their economy no good to have Jeanne Abadie hanging about debunking this
miracle as a figment of Marie’s imagination. So they immediately railroaded
Jeanne and her family out of the area, forever stigmatizing the Abadie clan as
miserable hucksters, naysayers, and frauds.
My
grandfather, Bernard Abadie, le boucher du village, probably had endured enough criticism because of
the ‘Stigma of Jeanne,’ and shortly before the turn of the century, migrated to
the United States from the Lourdes area in France, depositing nine children on
his newfound soil. My father, one of Bernard’s nine, spoke French until he was
approximately thirteen years old. He was raised in the Irish Channel area of
old New Orleans. I have no earthly idea why the area was called the Irish
Channel since it was populated primarily by people speaking French, German, and
Italian, and was renowned for being one of the roughest areas in the city. All
three cultures were first generation settlers and all three had their separate
Catholic Church located within a two block radius.
I once
asked my father why he lost his French language, because when I knew him, he
couldn’t say “hello” in French. He told me if he was speaking French on the
street with a friend, and one of the rival Italian or German gangs overheard
him, they pummeled him until he spoke English. Presumably, he did the same to
them when armed with his bande de
francais. He literally got the French beaten out of him by other children,
who spoke primarily German and Italian, in an area called The Irish Channel,
located within an English speaking country. Go figure!
Ultimately,
my father married a young local gal and moved across the Mississippi River from
New Orleans with his new bride.
One
blustery October day in 1937, Ilda Boylan Abadie, my father’s bride, deposited
this mass of human protoplasm onto a table in Hotel Dieu Hospital in New
Orleans. The doctor performed the ritual ass-slap and I uttered my first sound.
I haven’t cried much since then, although I probably should have, given the
mistakes I’ve made along the way. I often felt the ‘Stigma of Jeanne’ followed
my grandfather across the ocean and landed squarely on my shoulders. It has
plagued my every move since birth.
But
in the prophetic words of little Édith Piaf, Je ne regrette rien. Even if I did regret something, it’s too damn
late to change anything. I’m quite sure when my parents bent over the
bassinette, trying to coax a smile from their newest arrival, they never
anticipated their son would turn out the way he did.
The
way their son turned out is the subject of this book. I have taken various
vignettes from my life and pasted them together in what I hope is a
representative amalgam of one human’s time on this planet. I have not changed
the names of people in this opus to fictional ones, to protect either the
innocent or the guilty. I have portrayed each person as I remember them.
New
Orleans is a city replete with characters. I knew my share of them and have
tried to represent their flavor to the best of my abilities. I also am a
character, but I leave that to the reader to judge where I fit into the scheme
of things.
Some
may look upon this work as a primer on how not to live one’s life; but I would
have to disagree. I don’t know anyone else who has had as many experiences,
good and bad, as I have, and survived to tell the tale. I still drink good wine;
have wonderful and loyal friends, a loving family, and a wife I adore.
Who
can top that?
“Autobiography
is a preemptive strike against biographers,” said one wit. So, here’s my preemptive strike, as told
by an old man with plenty of life yet to live.
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Speculation
“Diyanu!” shouted the little man.
“Enough already. Pack your bags, we’re leaving this hellhole.”
That was my great, great...grandfather,
many centuries ago, admonishing his life with his little Jewish family in what
is now Syria. As soon as the clan heard him, they began gathering their
belongings, mounted a few donkeys and slowly meandered their way to the west.
Their homeland had been dominated by Sumerians, Egyptians, Hittites, Assyrians,
Babylonians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Persians, the Macedonian Greek, Alexander
the Great took a turn, and then the Romans stayed for a few hundred years. All
the while the old man’s family had remained in place, tending their sheep,
saying their prayers and studying their Torah. It was the expansion of the
Ottoman Empire that ultimately pissed the old man off and provoked him to move
his family; as if the Turks were any worse than their predecessors.
They traveled across Lebanon,
Palestine, Egypt; all the way to the Moroccan coast before they jumped across
the Strait of Gibraltar and entered Spain. They continued their travels north
and were finally stopped by the Pyrénées Mountains, as their exhausted donkeys
wouldn’t go one step further. There they banded together with a group of Jews
and began a new life; with a new batch of sheep, saying their prayers every
night, and studying their Torah.
In
the year 1492, Christopher Columbus took off from Spain seeking new routes to
the Far East. He was funded by Queen Isabella who is generally described as, “a
real bitch.” That same year, this austere lady had listened to her confessor
and spiritual advisor, Tomás de Torquemada, and issued an edict of general expulsion,
which drove any lingering Jews from the Iberian Peninsula. The Jewish locals
were given a chance to convert to Catholicism before being lashed to a fiery
stake. Those who did eschew the fire and convert were branded as conversos or new Christians.
One
of the families who converted from Judaism to Catholicism was my ancestors, the
Abadie clan. The new clan-master began hanging out with a group calling
themselves Basques, who had their own language and customs and accepted the Abadies’
into their group, as if they belonged there. Everything went along swimmingly
until Torquemada ran out of recalcitrant Jews and began burning even those
timid souls who had previously converted to the Roman church.
My
great, great…grandfather gathered together his brood of freshly minted
Catholics and sped across the Pyrénées Mountains with Torquemada’s fires nipping at their
heels. They settled in a small town known as Lourdes, where a group of
French-speaking Basques had already planted their flag. After a few hundred
years, and some serious inbreeding, you couldn’t tell an Abadie from any other
original Basque. Therefore, my heritage dictates that I am a Jewish-Catholic –
actually, I was raised Episcopalian – with Syrian-Basque-French-Spanish blood
coursing through my veins and causing great confusion throughout my body and
mind.
It
is here my story begins.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)